logo

• 목록
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

메세지 내용

Hell again in '09 Pornhub was running clean on the same stack with very few servers (when you think about the visitors).When you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the one ones needing it, however they saw a chance to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only thing bleeding is my eyes after i see something that could be wiped up in a normal PHP/Python/Ruby stack however instead is made with so many dependencies and third get together library that you just marvel if the dude who wrote it actually knows programming or if he simply glued cool techs collectively because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller players are often using outdated stuff, then again 99% of the online is. Hence why Wordpress is still a factor.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps positively are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that almost all have a tendency to not purchase the hype.



Inventions that were forward of their time will help us to know whether we're really able to reside on the planet we are making. Speculative fiction followers know that you can create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that characterize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the actual world is almost exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. Once we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of assist it could have on the planet during which it emerges and the ability it will have to remake that world.



When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, although his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement offered higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anyone involved in a tablet had in all probability been ready for one since even before the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the tablet computer was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world through which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cellular display and a large stationary one.



The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies that are commonplace at this time made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however because the world wasn’t fairly ready and they weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report told us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the first really good or actually profitable one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did threat its identification on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick demise after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality much creepier than any of us want.



But virtually a decade later, each major porn mom tech firm is either making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which again and again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, like the actual first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first gas powered automobile car introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The essential concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.