logo

• 목록
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

메세지 내용

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was working smooth on an analogous stack with very few servers (when you think about the traffic).If you happen to ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the only ones needing it, but they saw a possibility to scoop up market share in dev in order that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The one factor bleeding is my eyes after i see something that may very well be wiped up in a normal PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as an alternative is made with so many dependencies and 3rd occasion library that you just marvel if the dude who wrote it truly is aware of programming or if he simply glued cool techs together because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But yes, the smaller gamers are usually using outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the online is. Hence why Wordpress is still a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps positively are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, just that almost all have a tendency to not purchase the hype.


Inventions that had been ahead of their time may help us to know whether we're truly ready to reside on the earth we're making. Speculative fiction fans know that you may create a whole world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that signify a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the actual world is sort of precisely the same; that’s why invention is a threat. After we create something new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of support it could have on this planet in which it emerges and the power it should remake that world.


When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anyone taken with a tablet had in all probability been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that basically prepared the world for the tablet laptop was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world through which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one prepared for a bridge gadget between a small cell screen and a big stationary one.


The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences that are commonplace as we speak made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t fairly ready they usually weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report told us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary really good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit score for that. But, it did threat its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast demise after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality much creepier than any of us need.


But virtually a decade later, every main tech company is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then time and again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, the truth is, just like the precise first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first fuel powered vehicle car introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The essential thought of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long earlier than any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.