logo

• 목록
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

메세지 내용

Pornhub has began accepting cryptocurrency as a payment choice, the company introduced in the present day. The positioning now accepts Verge cryptocurrency (no relation to The Verge), a rebranded version of Dogecoindark, which cut up off from the original meme coin, Dogecoin, in 2014. Now, customers can pay for any Pornhub options, including a Premium subscription, using Verge cryptocurrency. Pornhub’s grownup sister websites, Brazzers and Nutaku, additionally settle for Verge cryptocurrency now. Verge cryptocurrency is anonymity-focused, which is why Pornhub executives say they chose it over other potential companions. It must be noted that anybody can view Verge cryptocurrency transactions by its public ledger, but it makes use of the anonymity tool Tor and an anonymous network layer I2P to hide particular transactions’ IP addresses and areas. Since public ledgers usually have their downfalls in defending anonymity, users also choose to cover on Verge cryptocurrency’s personal ledger. Corey Price, VP at Pornhub, tells The Verge that cryptocurrency provides "convenience and safety." It’s a dubious statement, contemplating most digital coins have high transaction fees and unstable prices that could be a problem for users. Companies like Valve and Stripe have ended their cryptocurrency assist for those very reasons. Stripe has even gone as far as adding cryptocurrency to its prohibited businesses list. Verge cryptocurrency has been fairly volatile, like other well-liked digital coins. 0.22 per coin however has since dropped again down. On the heels of this announcement in the present day, it rose to about 10 cents per coin, which remains to be low in comparison with more in style digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. "We’ve been looking at crypto for quite some time," says Price, including that Pornhub’s partner sites did accept restricted cryptocurrencies back when Bitcoin had newly emerged as a digital foreign money. Still, Pornhub wasn’t one of many websites to include cryptocurrency as a payment technique back then, likely as a result of Bitcoin’s costs had been nonetheless low.


Inventions that have been ahead of their time can assist us to know whether we are truly able to live in the world we're making. Speculative fiction followers know you can create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that signify a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the real world is nearly precisely the same; that’s why invention is a danger. After we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it can have on the earth wherein it emerges and the power it will have to remake that world.


When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that normally implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, even though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth provided higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And even though anybody thinking about a tablet had in all probability been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being filled with PADDs, the one thing that really prepared the world for the tablet pc was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world in which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one prepared for a bridge gadget between a small cell display and a big stationary one.


The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which might be commonplace as we speak made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, but because the world wasn’t quite prepared and so they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report told us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, in fact; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit score for that. But, it did threat its identification on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to only weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick death after a well-known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us need.